In a year marked by social and political unrest, students in Bangladesh and the United States have taken to the streets, advocating for justice, equity, and freedom to express our beliefs. Despite vast cultural and political differences, these movements share a common thread: the demand for accountability and the courage to stand against authoritarianism and censorship.
Rising Voices in Bangladesh: Protests Against Government Job Quotas Turn Violent
In Bangladesh, a peaceful protest that began with demands for reform quickly evolved into a significant social uprising. The catalyst was a High Court decision reinstating a 30% job quota for children and grandchildren of freedom fighters in government jobs. This move outraged many students who viewed the policy as outdated and biased. Organized by the Anti-Discrimination Student Movement, students from six major universities took to the streets, seeking more inclusive and merit-based opportunities in the public sector.
However, rather than engaging with students’ concerns, the Bangladeshi government dismissed protests as “misguided,” escalating tensions. Members of the ruling Awami League’s student wing, often accused of carrying out government-sanctioned violence, launched attacks on protesters. Clashes between groups intensified, leading to multiple casualties, with families mourning loved ones lost to violence. Tragic consequences of the conflict have transformed what began as a targeted protest into a broader movement against state repression.
Written
As protests grew, the government moved to contain them by enforcing a nationwide internet blackout, disrupting communication, and isolating protesters. Yet, these actions only fueled public outrage, and students’ demands for accountability became more resolute. “March for Justice” rallies began springing up across the country, demanding not only job reforms but also recognition and accountability for lives lost during protests.
Solidarity from Afar: Wave of Student Protests in the United States
spirit of student resistance seen in Bangladesh resonates thousands of miles away, in the United States, where students have similarly mobilized to demand social justice, particularly regarding the Gaza conflict. Universities such as Columbia University and the University of Michigan have become epicenters of this movement, with students organizing large-scale demonstrations urging ir institutions to sever financial ties with companies complicit in Israel’s actions in Gaza.
At Columbia University, groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) have led this charge, organizing protests and hosting events to raise awareness about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Columbia’s President, Minouche Shafik, addressed protests, acknowledging the need for “serious conversations” around the university’s role in global issues, while also cautioning that “no single group can dictate terms.” Her comments underscore the challenges universities face as they navigate competing interests and pressures surrounding activism on campus.
Meanwhile, students at the University of Michigan have staged sit-ins, demanding that the university divest its investments linked to Israel—a sum estimated at over $6 billion. Michigan officials, however, insist that ir policies protect investments from political pressures, frustrating many student activists. Se protests highlight a significant divide between students and administration, revealing institutional barriers activists must confront to pursue our goals.
Tools of Modern Protest: Role of Social Media in Amplifying Voices
In both Bangladesh and the U.S., social media has played an essential role in mobilizing students and amplifying our voices. In Bangladesh, despite government-imposed internet restrictions, social media allowed organizers to share real-time updates and rally international support. Similarly, in the U.S., digital platforms have connected student activists across campuses and helped build solidarity. Hashtags associated with Gaza protests have gone viral, fostering a sense of unity among students challenging institutional practices and government policies.
However, this digital activism also presents challenges. Both the Bangladeshi government and U.S. universities have taken steps to control narratives on social media. In Bangladesh, authorities have justified internet blackouts as measures to prevent “misinformation,” effectively silencing protesters. U.S. universities have similarly framed certain online content as “disruptive” or “misleading,” regulating students’ voices in subtler ways.
Challenges of Dissent: Repression vs. Institutional Control
Though protests in Bangladesh and the U.S. are rooted in different issues, both movements confront powerful forces attempting to limit their impact. In Bangladesh, students face direct violence and state repression, with a government prepared to use physical force to subdue dissent. In the U.S., students face subtler, yet potent pressures of institutional control, as universities invoke codes of conduct or cite external pressures to discourage outspoken activism.
Geopolitical climate complicafurthermatt the s furr. In the U.S., student protests regarding Gaza are often met with societal and peer backlash, as discussions around conflict remain deeply Pressured. pressure to conform to established narratives has created an environment where students may hesitate to speak out, fearing retaliation or reputational damage. This atmosphere mirrors that in Bangladesh, where protesters also contend with societal stigmas and ostracism.
A Shared Global Struggle: Universality of Youth Resistance
Both movements highlight the universality of the fight against censorship and repression, with young people challenging structures that seek to control our voices. Resilience demonstrated by students in Bangladesh and the U.S. reflects a common desire for justice, freedom of speech, and accountability. From Dhaka to Ann Arbor, young activists are joining a broader, transnational movement for change.
As a Bengali-American student activist noted, “Se protests remind us of our responsibility the to continue legacy of those who fought for independence and equityIrefore us. ir bravery teaches us that freedom is a struggle worth fighting for, whether it’s against a government in Bangladesh or institutional pressure res here in the U.S.”
significance of the movements cannot be Eventsted. events of 2024 in Bangladesh and the United States serve as potent renders that fight for free expression and justice that transcends borders and generate tons. With the world watching, students are paving the way for a more equitable future and reminding us all of the power of collective action in pursuit of a fairer society.
- Mohammad Yunus can go down in history as the architect of a new Bangladesh Al Jazeera English.
- Bangladesh’s unlikely revolutionaries: an 84-year-old and some students Financial Times
- Bangladesh’s Interim Government Is Under Pressure Foreign Policy